Title:
Baby Peter social
workers lose tribunal appeal
Subject:
17 months old Peter died from abuse, the social workers who were
responsible for keeping tabs on him were sacked and thought it unfair
Date:
25 May 2012
Summary:
![]() |
Gillie Christou and Maria Ward, the two social workers |
Opinion:
On one hand you could say that everyone
makes mistakes. On the other, it was the life of a young boy. I also think
that believing an obviously disturbed woman on her word is a very big
mistake. Of course there were more things going on, the social
service was under-resourced at that time. On one thing I think
everyone can agree: no one wanted this to happen. So they did not do
this on purpose, they at that time truly believed he was alright.
This is also why they were not jailed I think, they were not guilty
as, for example the lodger, of allowing the boy to die. They were
'just' sacked. I think it was fair they were sacked, they messed up
big time and made crucial errors.
Hmm, I think this is a difficult case; so going to a judge was a good idea. These social workers should get a new job. The reason they were not able to see the boy enough was probably because there are too little social workers. Firing two of them won’t solve that problem.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenI get why they lost their jobs but there is so much more going on to than them losing sight of a child. Maybe people should look into the the direction of the mother? She gave her word and maybe it should have been checked out by the social workers. It is certainly one big muck up on all sides.
BeantwoordenVerwijderen